Showing posts with label anglo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anglo. Show all posts

Saturday, July 23, 2011

EXTREMISM HAS NO RELIGION - What The Oslo Terrorist Attacks Teach Us About the World We Are Living in Today


I am not going to provide a summary for what happened in Oslo because it was all over the news.  I would like to call attention to some of the comments that were made by media in wake of these terrorist attacks:

This is a sobering reminder for those who think it’s too expensive to wage a war against jihadists. [...] Some irresponsible lawmakers on both sides of the aisle…would have us believe that enormous defense cuts would not affect our national security. Obama would have us believe that al-Qaeda is almost caput and that we can wrap up things in Afghanistan. All of these are rationalizations for doing something very rash, namely curbing our ability to defend the United States and our allies in a very dangerous world.”


“…in jihadist eyes, [Norway] will always remain guilty of being what it is: a liberal nation committed to freedom of speech and conscience, equality between the sexes, representative democracy, and every other freedom that defines the West. For being true to those ideals, Norwegians have now been asked to pay a terrible price.

           
“Norway also drew the ire of al Qaeda for publishing the controversial political cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed that appeared in a Danish newspaper and sparked outrage in the militant Islamic community.”


 “I think the betting is on terrorism. We don't know for sure, yet. But you've only got to look at the sort of blast that occurred. You've only got to look at the target - prime minister's office, the headquarters of the major newspaper group next door.
Why would that be relevant? Because the Norwegian newspapers republished the cartoons of Prophet Mohammad that caused such offense in the Muslim world. When that happened, the Norwegian telecoms offices in Pakistan were attacked and ransacked. The Norwegian embassy in Damascus was attacked. That is an issue that still rankles amongst Islamist militants the world over. So, that fact that Norwegian newspapers did that makes them a target.”




According to the article by Gharib and Waldron for ThinkProgress (found here: http://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/07/23/277310/wapos-jen-rubin-wsj-right-wing-pundits-jumped-to-blame-muslims-and-jihadists-for-norway-attacks/) the second comment was initially in the Wall Street Journal but was promptly re-written when news of the real attacker was discovered.


As everybody is aware now, the terrorist is actually one that no one would have thought –
32-year-old Anders Behring Breivik, who is apparently a right-wing extremist and not anti-Western but anti-Muslim.

Since the world has learned of this, there has been little usage of the words “terrorist”, “fundamentalism”, or “extremism”.  Why not? He committed acts of terrorism; he was an extremist, and a fundamentalist.  But no; instead of calling his attacks what they were, we seem to have a special group of people for whom these labels are reserved for – regardless of if they have done anything or not.

The point of this article is to say that violence, extremism, hatred, and fundamentalism come in all forms.  They are not inherently Muslim; the fact that the media immediately jumped to the conclusion that these acts must have been committed by Muslim terrorists is saddening and offensive to the vast majority of Muslims who are against these violent acts. 

The world hates them.  The world likes to pin every fear, every violent act, every problem on them.  After all, it is because of Muslims we are in Iraq or we are in Afghanistan.  It is because of Muslims that there are problems at the Gaza Strip.  It is because of Muslims that airport and border security has to be more strict. 

But the reverse is actually true.  It is because of stereotypes that they are blamed for every problem.  It is because of these viewpoints that innocent people are being killed and their homelands are destroyed in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as other places.  It is because of these wars that Muslims are treated as less than people.  It is because of these viewpoints that the prevailing viewpoint is that Palestinians are in the wrong, even though they are denied property, and healthcare, and the actions of a few destitute citizens result in disproportionate violent retaliations from Israel and others.  It is because of these widely-held beliefs of Muslims that when they are completely innocent, they are still nervous to cross the boarder or pass through airport security.  It is because of these viewpoints that time and time again, innocent people are held and tortured in Guantanamo Bay.  Muslims are victimized, searched, questioned, humiliated, and hated. It is because of these viewpoints that regular citizens are afraid of their own government.  They are afraid to say they are Muslim.

President Obama was often “accused” of being Muslim, as if being a Muslim, had he been one, was one of the most offensive things you could say to him.  He even venehemently denied it, because he saw it as such as well.

Many places in the United States have opposed mosques being built (with the ever-famous and incorrectly-named “Ground Zero Mosque”) which was clearly a “slap in the face” for Americans since they were “fighting Islam”; I must have been under the incorrect impression that they were fighting extremism – not the very religion.

And in doing  just that, the West is itself guilty of extremism in the name of Islamaophobia.  Muslims can no longer feel free to say and act how they want. They cannot openly express their religious beliefs through manner, speech, or dress, because they will be victimized and frowned upon. Having just a Muslim name or so-called “Muslim features” (“looking” South Asian or Middle Eastern) immediately labels them as extremists.  Simply attending a mosque becomes evidence against an innocent citizen.

The media consistently discusses the race and religion of suspects in “terrorist acts”; meanwhile, I have yet to hear a news anchor discussing the religion or race of a Christian white man who is committing similarly terroristic acts.

It is interesting that with such new ideas that people so quickly forget that there are Muslims who are citizens of our country. They contribute to the economy. They work hard just like anyone else. They pay their taxes. Muslims are signed up in the army. They also work as police officers, fire fighters, and other “patriotic” occupations.  They have families. They raise their children.  They want a good life.  There are Muslim teachers, professors, scholars,…the list goes on. They were affected by events like 9/11 just like “we” were; many Muslims lost their lives in those attacks as well, and in fact had to deal with a repercussion that most of us are not familiar with.  Following the attacks they were victimized and sought out; many were killed by angry citizens forgetting that the people they were targeting were citizens as well.

It seems that Islamaphobia has spiraled out of control so much that nobody thinks to question it.  Islam is simply bad and we do not want “those people” to express their “crazy” or “backwards” or “violent” religion.  We will do anything to keep them under control and hate them for being in “our” country.

But when I watch the news that tells me another school has been blown up in Afghanistan, or another cab driver was killed for being Muslim, or another person is tortured in Guantanamo, given no trial, or disclosure as to why he is a suspect, before being set free and found to be innocent, I ask myself yet again, “Who are the real terrorists?”


-Nancy L.

Sources           
 

A little to think about when it comes to racism…

My name is Belisa. This is my first contribution to The Needle in the Haystack which I am sure will turn out to be a wonderful project.  Without further delay:

This little piece is to question the internalized racism I have experienced all my life. People sometimes without even realizing it, have these internalized notions that white- lighter- Anglo- is somehow always better. The truth is that there is a big difference between patriotism and being racist. Yes, you can (and I believe you should), be proud of your roots and what your culture has to offer. However, racism falls into believing a race in superior to others, which is completely absurd. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, this is a true cliché. I wish the problem would stop there, that Caucasian people think white is better, but internalized racism is such a big part of our society that even non-Caucasian people think white is best. Many people no matter their background including Latinos, Middle Eastern, African, European etc… have this belief that lighter is better, just because it’s just that, lighter. Lighter features are preferred all over the world for some reason they are thought as more beautiful. In my country, Mexico, the gueritos get so many more people interested in them, simply because they are lighter than the rest, they don’t even have to be actually good looking, but to many people just the fact that they are lighter makes them more desirable.

I beg to differ, lighter is not necessarily prettier. Beautiful eyes are beautiful no matter their colour; features are beautiful no matter their colour. However, I think a big part of the blame still has to be put on colonialism. By now most of the world is a colonized society, which helps to put an explanation about this belief of white supremacy. People who come from colonized parts of the world have this embedded code in their upbringing that white is superior, that is why white people always win, that is why white people can take whatever they want and nothing happens, they are boss wherever they go. This of course is no longer true, it was before when their countries were being colonized, but the pain and the feeling that they are not as good enough as the colonizers remains in their education. This may seem farfetched to you, but there are innumerable examples we can extract from. Why are there skin lightening creams? Why are people fascinated with bleaching their hair to look unnaturally blonde? Why do people insist on pretending they have blue or green eyes by wearing contacts? Why is it that the African American women who are considered desirable in the media are mostly the lighter skin ones such as Tyra Banks, Rihanna and Beyonce? This is something I believe we have to fight to get rid of, and truly analyze it and ask ourselves where this comes from, because if we really take a look at it, it really makes no sense. This only feeds oppression, insecurities, racism and pain. There is no point in keeping this notion alive.

Here is some food for thought: did you know that genetically the black race is considered the perfect race? That is part of why they were enslaved, they are the strongest, most agile, and most resistant. Did you also know that genetically light eyes are considered a deformation? That is why over 50% of the human population has brown eyes; they are the normal and healthy shade of eyes to have. The point is to appreciate who you are, and stop internally degrading some races and upholding others, it does not make sense and it only leads to hate. Here is a little piece I did out of frustration I have felt all my life from by culture being degraded…

You tell me I don’t look like the people from my land and you expect me to take it as a compliment.

Why are green eyes and light skin valued over my brother’s dark skin and my mother’s gorgeous brown eyes? He has the colour of the sun surrounding him, the beautiful colour of bronze infused in his skin.

If anything these traits that I have inherited are my least valued.

These green eyes and this pale skin are prevalent in the land of the people that raped and killed my people, that slaved them, degraded them, tortured them, humiliated them, and stole from them. Would you like to be told you are lucky to look like the man who raped your mother? No? Neither do I.

I do not pride myself in these and I do not take it as a compliment that you make my mild differences come to light. I embrace my looks, but when you try to make my "lighter" features appear to be more beautiful than those more common in my people then we have a problem.

If you are going to compliment me compliment me in my curves that the women from my land are well known for, compliment my natural rhythm that we are blessed with and the warmth in our manner that comes so naturally to us.


Do not tell me I do not look Mexican, you do not know Mexicans.


 -Belisa