Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label culture. Show all posts

Saturday, July 23, 2011

EXTREMISM HAS NO RELIGION - What The Oslo Terrorist Attacks Teach Us About the World We Are Living in Today


I am not going to provide a summary for what happened in Oslo because it was all over the news.  I would like to call attention to some of the comments that were made by media in wake of these terrorist attacks:

This is a sobering reminder for those who think it’s too expensive to wage a war against jihadists. [...] Some irresponsible lawmakers on both sides of the aisle…would have us believe that enormous defense cuts would not affect our national security. Obama would have us believe that al-Qaeda is almost caput and that we can wrap up things in Afghanistan. All of these are rationalizations for doing something very rash, namely curbing our ability to defend the United States and our allies in a very dangerous world.”


“…in jihadist eyes, [Norway] will always remain guilty of being what it is: a liberal nation committed to freedom of speech and conscience, equality between the sexes, representative democracy, and every other freedom that defines the West. For being true to those ideals, Norwegians have now been asked to pay a terrible price.

           
“Norway also drew the ire of al Qaeda for publishing the controversial political cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed that appeared in a Danish newspaper and sparked outrage in the militant Islamic community.”


 “I think the betting is on terrorism. We don't know for sure, yet. But you've only got to look at the sort of blast that occurred. You've only got to look at the target - prime minister's office, the headquarters of the major newspaper group next door.
Why would that be relevant? Because the Norwegian newspapers republished the cartoons of Prophet Mohammad that caused such offense in the Muslim world. When that happened, the Norwegian telecoms offices in Pakistan were attacked and ransacked. The Norwegian embassy in Damascus was attacked. That is an issue that still rankles amongst Islamist militants the world over. So, that fact that Norwegian newspapers did that makes them a target.”




According to the article by Gharib and Waldron for ThinkProgress (found here: http://thinkprogress.org/security/2011/07/23/277310/wapos-jen-rubin-wsj-right-wing-pundits-jumped-to-blame-muslims-and-jihadists-for-norway-attacks/) the second comment was initially in the Wall Street Journal but was promptly re-written when news of the real attacker was discovered.


As everybody is aware now, the terrorist is actually one that no one would have thought –
32-year-old Anders Behring Breivik, who is apparently a right-wing extremist and not anti-Western but anti-Muslim.

Since the world has learned of this, there has been little usage of the words “terrorist”, “fundamentalism”, or “extremism”.  Why not? He committed acts of terrorism; he was an extremist, and a fundamentalist.  But no; instead of calling his attacks what they were, we seem to have a special group of people for whom these labels are reserved for – regardless of if they have done anything or not.

The point of this article is to say that violence, extremism, hatred, and fundamentalism come in all forms.  They are not inherently Muslim; the fact that the media immediately jumped to the conclusion that these acts must have been committed by Muslim terrorists is saddening and offensive to the vast majority of Muslims who are against these violent acts. 

The world hates them.  The world likes to pin every fear, every violent act, every problem on them.  After all, it is because of Muslims we are in Iraq or we are in Afghanistan.  It is because of Muslims that there are problems at the Gaza Strip.  It is because of Muslims that airport and border security has to be more strict. 

But the reverse is actually true.  It is because of stereotypes that they are blamed for every problem.  It is because of these viewpoints that innocent people are being killed and their homelands are destroyed in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as other places.  It is because of these wars that Muslims are treated as less than people.  It is because of these viewpoints that the prevailing viewpoint is that Palestinians are in the wrong, even though they are denied property, and healthcare, and the actions of a few destitute citizens result in disproportionate violent retaliations from Israel and others.  It is because of these widely-held beliefs of Muslims that when they are completely innocent, they are still nervous to cross the boarder or pass through airport security.  It is because of these viewpoints that time and time again, innocent people are held and tortured in Guantanamo Bay.  Muslims are victimized, searched, questioned, humiliated, and hated. It is because of these viewpoints that regular citizens are afraid of their own government.  They are afraid to say they are Muslim.

President Obama was often “accused” of being Muslim, as if being a Muslim, had he been one, was one of the most offensive things you could say to him.  He even venehemently denied it, because he saw it as such as well.

Many places in the United States have opposed mosques being built (with the ever-famous and incorrectly-named “Ground Zero Mosque”) which was clearly a “slap in the face” for Americans since they were “fighting Islam”; I must have been under the incorrect impression that they were fighting extremism – not the very religion.

And in doing  just that, the West is itself guilty of extremism in the name of Islamaophobia.  Muslims can no longer feel free to say and act how they want. They cannot openly express their religious beliefs through manner, speech, or dress, because they will be victimized and frowned upon. Having just a Muslim name or so-called “Muslim features” (“looking” South Asian or Middle Eastern) immediately labels them as extremists.  Simply attending a mosque becomes evidence against an innocent citizen.

The media consistently discusses the race and religion of suspects in “terrorist acts”; meanwhile, I have yet to hear a news anchor discussing the religion or race of a Christian white man who is committing similarly terroristic acts.

It is interesting that with such new ideas that people so quickly forget that there are Muslims who are citizens of our country. They contribute to the economy. They work hard just like anyone else. They pay their taxes. Muslims are signed up in the army. They also work as police officers, fire fighters, and other “patriotic” occupations.  They have families. They raise their children.  They want a good life.  There are Muslim teachers, professors, scholars,…the list goes on. They were affected by events like 9/11 just like “we” were; many Muslims lost their lives in those attacks as well, and in fact had to deal with a repercussion that most of us are not familiar with.  Following the attacks they were victimized and sought out; many were killed by angry citizens forgetting that the people they were targeting were citizens as well.

It seems that Islamaphobia has spiraled out of control so much that nobody thinks to question it.  Islam is simply bad and we do not want “those people” to express their “crazy” or “backwards” or “violent” religion.  We will do anything to keep them under control and hate them for being in “our” country.

But when I watch the news that tells me another school has been blown up in Afghanistan, or another cab driver was killed for being Muslim, or another person is tortured in Guantanamo, given no trial, or disclosure as to why he is a suspect, before being set free and found to be innocent, I ask myself yet again, “Who are the real terrorists?”


-Nancy L.

Sources           
 

Why SAT Results Were Not Reflective of Student Ability, & Why This Is Still Relevant


Early SATs had questions like this:

RUNNER is to MARATHON
(RUNNER : MARATHON)
is the same as
A) envoy : embassy
B) martyr : massacre
C) oarsman : regatta
D) referee : tournament
E) horse : stable

In this case, C is the correct answer.

First of all, why is this a clear reflection of biased testing? Because only people of a certain class have ever encountered a “regatta” and know what it is (I sure didn’t). So if there are questions that privilege upper class individuals (and because wealth is racialized) what these crafty test makers concluded was that those students who were of a certain economic and ethnic background happened to be “less intelligent” all because the questions were ethno- and culturally- centric. Obviously such blatant favoring of particular classes and ethnic groups (i.e. upper-class white Americans) no longer occurs in the test.

Yet this is still of relevance. Not only did decades of such views on Black students or of students of lower classes change how society saw and treated them, but it has lent itself to a historical conception of the aforementioned groups; ideas like this only added to already negative stereotypes of these groups and stereotypical views can become so ingrained that even after knowing the tests were skewed these underlying ideas of such groups never really go away. This is just one miniscule example of why history is not really over after the events pass because they remain a part of the inner conceptions of both actors involved.

In the same token the British may no longer be colonizing South Asia, and the United States is no longer enslaving African Americans; but both of these practices brough with them conceptions of the aforementioned people, whether it was that they were “backward”, “savage”, “uncivilized”, “unintelligent” (etc.) and while the practice went away these conceptions did not necessarily disappear.  They were in fact still relevant in the subsequent treatment and general view of these persons colonized, enslaved, or not. such conceptions can be carried over decades, even centuries, and this is why history is never “over” – it remains relevant and very much alive.


Consciously yours,
Malcolm [Exorcise the Demons]

Try the Real Paradise


Cenote Dos Ojos
I would like to share a tendency I have. I tend to view the world in a practical way; I like practical solutions to the problems we face. Of course the first step to changing our world is being as aware as possible about the problems in the world, but awareness needs to be followed by action. That action is in fact practical, doable in the society we live in, and fit to the lives we lead. We may not save the world, but can hopefully help at least some with our actions. So for this blog, I would like to share a little bit about a different type of tourism, an alternative tourism, in one of the most popular vacation destinations to us, Mexico.


I want to shed light on an alternative option to Mexico’s resorts because this supports Mexico’s indigenous people. Indigenous people all around the world are amongst the most alienated, poor, and abused populations that exist. To this day, they are still paying the consequences of colonization. The abuses they have suffered (and still suffer) throughout history have left them not only an embedded negative emotional impact, but also a social and economic impact. In their towns they lack access to education, appropriate health care, and sometimes their basic needs. According to Mexico’s Government Agency for the Development of Indigenous People, the average indigenous family lives on less than a US$1 a day. This is obviously problematic, as most of these people live below the poverty line. So let’s talk about what we can do to support them.

Everyone that I have ever met loves going to Mexico, or if they haven’t been able to travel there, would like to do so in the future. Reasons are clear: Mexico is globally known for its beautiful beaches, its beautiful and hospitable people, its amazing food, its rich culture etc…
Why not enjoy all of these aspects that make Mexico a world renowned touristic destination while supporting its local indigenous communities? Next time you are planning to visit Mexico make a reservation at one of the hotels that are provided all over the country (Riviera Maya, Michoacán, Campeche, Oaxaca, Chiapas, Hidalgo, etc…) by local indigenous people. But I’ll focus on the south of Mexico because I know that is a very popular choice. The hotels in the Yucatan have in their backyard the famous Mayan pyramids, and what better than to be bumping elbows with Mayans themselves? It is Mexican culture at its finest, at its purest, coming back into the pre-Hispanic roots that started it all. I am sure it is close to impossible to find better hospitality, because the native people will be glad to have you; will be pleased with your interest in their culture. These little hotels offer a variety of tours and activities, such as swimming in the gorgeous cenotes (underwater caves), of Yucatan, bike tours, bungee jumping, snorkelling, finishing, and much more... They also offer all-inclusive packages, which means absolutely mouth-watering authentic all-you-can-eat food (nothing North American- washed like the food you may get on main stream resorts.  After all, you’re in Mexico right? You want the real deal). All of this is just minutes away from the gorgeous beaches and the amazing archaeological sites, such as the pyramids. Because these hotels are owned and operated by the local indigenous people, you are guaranteed to be helping their community, and not just some rich person who owns a mainstream resort, and it’s all at a fraction of the usual price. Not only that, but as part of this program, the indigenous people are trying to promote eco-tourism by offering environmentally-friendly activities to the tourists, and their hotels are built with local grown materials that they have built themselves. Cool huh?

So I invite you to meet the wonderful Mayans, eat their food, share a laugh, share their art and history, and have a toast (with tequila of course) to a more united world. Once you have tasted what Mexico has to offer look into what the other native people around the world have to offer when you visit their homeland. I bet it’s awesome. 

 -Kevin Alcott

Resources:
Cenote of Yucatan picture:
http://nauticajonkepa.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/cenote-dos-ojos.jpg
Guide/ List of Alternative Mexican Tourism:
Videos and Phone Numbers to resort in Yucatan: